Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Low health insurance caps leave patients stranded

Mary Wusterbarth thought her toddler was struggling with an ear infection when she seemed sluggish. Instead, a virus had attacked the little girl's heart, damaging it beyond repair. Brea needed a transplant.

Within three weeks of a 2007 doctor visit, the 20-month-old had exhausted the $1 million lifetime maximum on her health insurance. Her parents have scrambled ever since for ways to cover thousands of dollars in monthly medical costs.

"We have no idea what kind of financial future we have," said Wusterbarth, of Wake Forest, N.C. "The medical bills come almost daily. There's never an end."

Insurers set lifetime limits See Mega Life and Health, to keep rates low on some policies, but holders are learning that individual caps that seemed large quickly max out as health care costs soar. Several patient advocacy groups are prodding insurers to raise the caps, which generally don't adjust for inflation. Congress also is considering two bills that would do that.

Only 1 percent of employer-offered group plans — the largest health insurance segment — had caps as low as $1 million last year, according to a survey by The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. But 22 percent had caps of less than $2 million, and some want to see all these relatively low maximums eliminated.

Insurers, however, say most health coverage already offers either a comfortable maximum of several million dollars or unlimited coverage. They note that more government regulation could lead to higher coverage costs, and low lifetime caps help them offer a greater variety of coverages.

"I think the discussion needs to move into why do some health care services cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and what can we do to address those issues," said Robert Zirkelbach of America's Health Insurance Plans, a trade association representing nearly 1,300 insurers.

Kelly and Tom Treinen used to think the $1 million individual cap that came with the insurance they had for seven years offered plenty of protection. In fact, they chose that plan, which Kelly received through her job as an elementary school principal, over a higher-priced option through Tom's business. That one offered a $5 million cap.

Then doctors diagnosed their teenage son, Michael, with an aggressive form of leukemia in May 2007. His treatment called for 10 doses of a chemotherapy drug that cost $10,000 per dose. A 56-day stay in an intensive care unit cost about $400,000.

Michael reached his $1 million lifetime maximum in less than a year. The Noblesville, Ind., family had to issue a public plea for help after a hospital told them it needed either $600,000 in certified insurance or a $500,000 deposit to continue preparing for a critical bone marrow transplant.

The Treinens raised $865,000 in six days. Money came from all over the United States and as far away as Germany. But Michael's cancer had stopped responding to chemotherapy, and he died May 25 before he could receive the transplant.

The family had no idea how fast costs were piling up. Some initial bills didn't arrive until months after treatment started. Then they would receive multiple mailings for each treatment, each listing a different amount — the hospital cost, the insurance discount, the amount they owed.

"When you're dealing with constant care of your child, you're not going home with a calculator and adding up to see where you're at," Kelly Treinen said.

Insurance can shield patients from the true cost of health care, said Jerry Flanagan, health care policy director for California-based Consumer Watchdog. He noted that most people have no idea how quickly $1 million "can evaporate," unless they've been seriously ill before.

"You can eat through a million-dollar lifetime cap in two or three surgeries," he said.

Low lifetime maximums are found more often in small-employer group plans, Flanagan said, noting that those businesses generally have less insurance buying power. He said employers often give their workers a choice on plans or premiums but not on lifetime maximums.

The Kaiser Family Foundation study says a greater percentage of employer-offered group plans are providing lifetime caps of at least $2 million, and the percentage that offers caps below $2 million has declined slightly.

But medical costs for employer-sponsored health plans should increase 9.9 and 9.6 percent this year and next, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers Health Research Institute.

"The nature of caps is that over time it becomes easier and easier to hit (them) because the cost of health care services keeps going up," said Mike Thompson, a health care and employee benefits expert with the firm.

A coverage cap of $1 million in the 1970s would have had to grow to more than $10 million today to keep pace with rising costs, said Glenn Mones of the National Hemophilia Foundation.

The foundation's vice president for public policy says he's seen more patients approach their lifetime caps in recent years. People with hemophilia can spend more than $200,000 a year just on drugs that prevent internal bleeding.

His foundation renewed a lobbying push in Congress this year for higher lifetime caps because it sees a better political climate for one.

U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., unsuccessfully pitched a bill on lifetime caps in 1996. She will try again this summer because she sees better odds with a Democrat majority in the House of Representatives. Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., introduced a similar bill in March in the Senate.

Mary Wusterbarth, a stay-at-home mother with two other children, thinks legislation on minimum lifetime caps is an excellent idea. Her daughter, Brea, is 3 now and doing well. But family finances aren't as healthy.

The Wusterbarths spent more than $20,000 to adopt Brea from China in 2006. Then her heart began to fail, just months after she arrived at their Louisiana home.

She qualified for Medicaid while hospitalized for the transplant, but that coverage ended once she was released. The family has since moved to North Carolina, where Brea's father, Danny, works as an operations manager for a distribution center.

They drained their savings and spent more than $60,000 out of pocket on medical bills in the past year. Church donations have helped, and they negotiated some discounts to wind up with $50,000 in insurance coverage for Brea they hope will last the next six months.

But Danny Wusterbarth makes too much money for Brea to receive Medicaid coverage. Insurers won't cover Brea because of the medical history, a common problem with people who reach caps.

Brea's anti-rejection drugs run about $3,000 a month. The biopsies she needs every few months to check for rejection can cost $40,000. She'll also need another transplant in about 10 years. Her mother isn't sure where all the money will come from.

"We were actually told that if we would get a divorce or if he would quit his job, then she could get all the help she needed," Wusterbarth said. "But that's not the way we do things, so we just take it day by day."

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Health Care for America Now ads promote universal health insurance

Health Care for America Now ads urge universal, affordable coverage

In three South Florida cities and nationally, a coalition of unions and social interest groups kicked off a $40 million campaign Tuesday to push for universal and affordable health insurance.

The main thrust of the Health Care for America Now campaign is ads depicting everyday Americans lamenting costly health care and coverage denials, reminiscent of the insurance industry's "Harry and Louise" ads in the 1990s that helped kill the Clinton national health plan. This time, insurers are the bad guys.

"We are at the mercy of the health-care industry that puts profits first and us second," said Quanisha Smith of the Florida Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, which is heading the campaign here.

The coalition staged events in Fort Lauderdale, where Smith spoke, and West Palm Beach, Miami and 50 other cities. Among the main architects are four unions, MoveOn and Planned Parenthood, liberal-leaning groups.

Some insurance officials labeled the campaign partisan politicking for the Democrats. America's Health Insurance Plans, an industry trade group, said it has a plan to attack high costs caused by overused and misused services and by a proliferation of new technology not proven to work, president and CEO Karen Ignagni said.

But campaign spokeswoman Jacki Schechner said there's no election agenda. She said the aim is to pressure the government to start a public health plan for those without private coverage, make insurers cover all medical care, peg premiums and co-pays to income, and more closely regulate the industry.

For More Call Evan Tunis at 561.637.8162 or visit www.floridahealthcareinsurance.com

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Florida Sen. Mel Martinez's flip-flop on Medicare vote is mott

Florida Sen. Mel Martinez's flip-flop on Medicare vote is moot

WASHINGTON - Nobody wants to be on the bad side of grandma and her doctor -- as U.S. Sen. Mel Martinez demonstrated Wednesday.

Intensively lobbied by Florida seniors and doctors to change his vote and roll back a major cut in fees for doctors who treat Medicare patients, Martinez flipped. But only after it was clear his side had lost.

Perhaps inspired by a surprise visit from cancer-stricken Sen. Ted Kennedy -- his first Senate appearance since brain surgery in June -- the Senate voted 69-30 to cut off debate on the bill, a vote that by previous agreement also approved the bill. The margin is enough to overcome a promised presidential veto.

Nearly two weeks ago, a similar cloture vote, which requires 60 votes, failed 58-40. Martinez was one of nine Republicans who voted "no" -- and switched positions Wednesday.

Two hours earlier, he had told a reporter he had no intention of changing his vote, even though it meant doctors treating Medicare patients would see their fees cut by 10.6 percent beginning next week.

"From time to time, we have to do what we think is the right thing," Martinez said.

Then came the wholesale switch by Republican senators.

"The measure we moved forward today does not provide the kind of solution doctors deserve," Martinez said in a statement afterward, "but this is the only option to stop doctors in Florida from having their pay cut by 10.6 percent. It is also the only option to ensure that seniors continue to have uninterrupted access to health care."

Before the vote, doctors said they would have to stop taking new Medicare patients or even stop seeing Medicare patients at all. The government health insurance program covers 3.15 million Floridians.

"It's going to significantly reduce access to [health] care for Medicare patients," said Egerton K. van den Berg Jr., an Orlando cardiologist. "You can't afford to take care of those patients."

Advocates for seniors agreed.

"It doesn't do you a lot of good to have Medicare and not have a doctor to go to," said Jeff Johnson, head of AARP Florida. He said 10,000 members called or e-mailed Martinez and Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., who already supported the bill.

Why did Martinez originally oppose the bill?

To restore the Medicare fees, it cuts payments to private insurers who sell Medicare Advantage programs by about $13.5 billion over five years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

About 856,000 people in Florida are enrolled in Medicare Advantage.

The Bush administration likes the program, which operates like a health-maintenance organization, because it's not government-run, but Democrats say the payments to insurers are too generous.

Martinez's staff said the cuts would result in about 150,000 Florida seniors being dropped by their insurance companies.

"It's not an easy decision to come to because you don't want the doctors to get a cut," Martinez said about his earlier vote, adding that he was trying to force a compromise. He blamed Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid for pushing "a political exercise."

The bill passed the House 355-59 with bipartisan support. President Bush now must decide whether to follow through on his veto threats.

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Florida Health Insurance Consultant Comments On Insurance Bill Stalls, Says Overhaul is Needed

Main Category: Health Insurance / Medical Insurance
Article Date: 28 Jun 2007 - 1:00 PDT

Florida lawmakers are supposed to discuss changes to (KidCare), the state's version of SCHIP, (health insurance) during the special legislative session that began last week, says Morgan Moran, a Florida health insurance consultant. Gov. Charlie Crist, a Republican (R), and other legislative leaders said a bipartisan group of lawmakers this year "introduced a proposal to streamline KidCare" but could not reach an agreement before the legislative session ended last month.

The central disagreement on the insurance bill, was over whether the Department of Health, or the Agency for Health Care Administration should run the new Florida health insurance program. Supporters of the legislation, like Moran, say the "serious differences have been resolved and lawmakers should approve the bill now" rather than wait until the fall, when the Legislature might hold an additional special session.

Health Insurance is one of the main topics for the 2008 presidential campaigns. One says he has a plan to "fix the broken down health insurance industry", and to provide coverage not only for children and the poor, but every American citizen. Presidential Candidate John Edwards' health care plan, "includes coverage for all American's" as well as a drug patent process overhaul. Edward's said "his proposal would cost $90 billion to $120 billion annually and that he would fund the plan through the elimination of tax cuts proposed by President Bush".

Florida health insurance consultant Morgan Moran of www.FloridaHealthcareInsurance.com said Edwards' proposal also would "require employers to provide health insurance for workers" or contribute 6% of their payrolls to a fund that would help individuals purchase coverage. More on the story is available at the Florida Healthcare Insurance web site Florida Health Insurance web site .

About Florida Healthcare Insurance

Florida Health Insurance is an online source of health insurance agents and insurance carriers covering individuals in the state of Florida. Individuals can get insurance quotes, search rates online by city, read current insurance news and events. For a directory and archive of Florida Health Insurance Consultants, a listing of the best rates and free quotes, please visit www.FloridaHealthcareInsurance.com

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Coalition to Lobby for Florida Healthcare Reform

WASHINGTON, July 8 (Reuters) - A coalition of unions, think tanks and other groups launched an advertising campaign on Tuesday saying they want to ensure that health-care reform tops the U.S. political agenda after the November elections.

The group, Health Care for America Now, said it had the backing of 100 labor groups, community organizations, medical groups and activists.

The non-profit group is headquartered on Washington's K Street, known for its high-powered lobbyists, and said it was immediately starting a $1.5 million advertising campaign on television, newspapers and online, with an eventual spending goal of $40 million.

"This is the human rights movement of our time," said Jeff Blum, executive director of USAction, a non-profit that campaigns for strengthening of Medicare, Social Security and other entitlements.

"If there is one thing that our government should be guaranteeing each one of us, it is the basic, fundamental right to affordable and quality health care. This must be the birthright of every American."

Some of the groups backing the organization include the National Education Association, the National Women's Law Center, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and the Service Employees International Union, which represents health-care workers among others.

By any measure, health-care reform is among the top issues concerning American voters.

Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain of Arizona and Democratic candidate Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois say they are putting together health-care reform plans.

Other groups have too, including retailers, employers and labor unions. The United States has no single health-care system but relies on a patchwork of private, public and employer-sponsored insurance plans -- and 47 million Americans lack any coverage.

The new group says it wants to keep the best of what already exists, without moving to a fully nationalized system.

"Americans can keep the private insurance they have, join a new private insurance plan, or choose a public health insurance plan," the group said in a statement.

"The campaign also calls for a government role in setting and enforcing rules on the insurance industry which consistently charges whatever it wants, sets high deductibles, denies coverage based on pre-existing conditions, and drops coverage when people get sick."